
In this multilevel study, the authors investigate the influence of country‐level formal institutions and workgroup behavior on foreign subsidiary employees' participation in employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs). Based on the perspectives of bounded rationality, transaction cost theory, and psychological ownership, the authors argue that weak formal institutions restrain multinational enterprises from effectively implementing ESOPs due to reduced employee participation. However, the authors expect that workgroup behavior—more specifically, the participation of the workgroup's members and superiors in ESOPs—has a positive influence on employees' ESOP participation. Furthermore, the authors analyze whether cross‐level effects of institutions and workgroup behavior function as substitutes or complements. They empirically examine the ESOP participation of 185,291 foreign subsidiary employees in 28 countries. The results confirm the hypotheses about direct effects of weak institutions and workgroup behavior and additionally provide support for a complementary relationship between institutions and workgroup behavior.
HUMAN-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, SHARE OWNERSHIP, EMERGING ECONOMIES, bounded rationality, transaction cost theory, ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR, PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP, psychological ownership, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, HRM PRACTICES, employee stock ownership plan (ESOP), FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT, ENTRY MODE CHOICE, multilevel analysis, institutional context, PANEL-DATA
HUMAN-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, SHARE OWNERSHIP, EMERGING ECONOMIES, bounded rationality, transaction cost theory, ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR, PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP, psychological ownership, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, HRM PRACTICES, employee stock ownership plan (ESOP), FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT, ENTRY MODE CHOICE, multilevel analysis, institutional context, PANEL-DATA
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
