
doi: 10.1002/hpm.2559
pmid: 29943866
SummaryThe notion of strategic purchasing has gained increasing currency in the global health policy discourse. It is believed that an active prudent purchaser is able to act in the best interest of both government and consumers as a third party negotiating with providers for cost‐effective care. It would be wrong, however, to assume that the formation of a third‐party purchaser automatically leads to such desired outcomes. A variety of agency problems relating to incompetence often prevent purchasers from fulfilling their mandates, aggravating cost inflation. This study provides an alternative explanation for the rapid cost inflation in the Chinese health system, by focusing on the unique role played by the social health insurance administration. Provincial‐level panel data analysis reveals that misaligned bureaucratic incentives and limited administrative capacity of the social health insurance administration contribute significantly to rapidly escalating costs. This study argues that despite the merit of the notion of third‐party strategic purchasing, it must not be forgotten that effective purchasing hinges on certain crucial prerequisites that may not necessarily be present in reality. Appropriate alignment of the social health insurance administration's organizational mandates and development of its capacity is essential to China's move towards strategic purchasing of health services.
China, Value-Based Purchasing, Strategic purchasing, Insurance, Health, Agency, Databases, Factual, National Health Programs, Third-party purchase, Insurance, Health, Reimbursement, Social health insurance
China, Value-Based Purchasing, Strategic purchasing, Insurance, Health, Agency, Databases, Factual, National Health Programs, Third-party purchase, Insurance, Health, Reimbursement, Social health insurance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
