
SUMMARYOver the past three decades, the public health landscape in Thailand has shifted remarkably. Currently chronic non‐communicable diseases represent the largest cause of mortality in the Thai population. In light of the current situation, this paper synthesizes what is known about the chronic non‐communicable disease situation in Thailand and analyzes current policy responses. Relevant contextual factors such as socio‐economic transitions, health systems development, and health workforce capacities are also considered. Primary data for this study were collected by a review of policy documents, government statements, and statistics reported by the Thailand Ministry of Public Health. Secondary data were obtained by a thorough review of the existing literature. The paper finds that while current policy responses to chronic non‐communicable diseases in the health sector have focused on improving prevention and control of risk factors, a stronger emphasis on chronic disease treatment and management may be needed in the future. The paper concludes with an exploration of the potential for developing and implementing realistic public health responses to the growing burden of chronic non‐communicable diseases in a Southeast Asian country context by utilizing existing capacities in research, policy, and health workforce development. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Adult, Male, Health Policy, HIV Infections, Thailand, Socioeconomic Factors, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cardiovascular Disease, Neoplasms, Health Sciences, Chronic Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Female, Kidney Diseases, Obesity, Preventive Medicine, Public Health, Policy Making, Delivery of Health Care, Cancer
Adult, Male, Health Policy, HIV Infections, Thailand, Socioeconomic Factors, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cardiovascular Disease, Neoplasms, Health Sciences, Chronic Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Female, Kidney Diseases, Obesity, Preventive Medicine, Public Health, Policy Making, Delivery of Health Care, Cancer
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
