Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Head & Neckarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Head & Neck
Article . 2014 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
Head & Neck
Article . 2015
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Radiographic extracapsular extension and treatment outcomes in locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma

Authors: Benjamin H, Kann; Michael, Buckstein; Todd J, Carpenter; Richard, Bakst; Krzysztof, Misiukiewicz; Eric, Genden; Marshall, Posner; +3 Authors

Radiographic extracapsular extension and treatment outcomes in locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPathologic extracapsular extension (pECE) in metastatic lymph nodes is associated with poor prognosis for oropharyngeal carcinoma. The prognostic value of radiographic extracapsular extension (rECE) has not been studied.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted of 111 patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma treated in the Mount Sinai Radiation Oncology Department with accessible pretreatment CT reports. Univariate Kaplan–Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses compared cohorts for locoregional control, distant control, progression‐free (PFS), and overall survival (OS).ResultsSixty‐four patients had rECE‐present and 47 had rECE‐absent scans. The patients with rECE presence had significantly worse OS (3‐year: 95% vs 77%; p = .006), PFS (3‐year: 91% vs 71%; p = .002), and distant control (3‐year: 98% vs 81%; p = .008), with no difference in locoregional control. On multivariate analysis, rECE‐presence was a negative prognosticator for OS, PFS, and distant control.ConclusionThis study suggests that rECE is an independent prognosticator of poor distant control and survival with little impact on locoregional control for oropharyngeal carcinoma. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 36: 1689–1694, 2014

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck, Middle Aged, Survival Analysis, Oropharyngeal Neoplasms, Treatment Outcome, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Predictive Value of Tests, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Female, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    44
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
44
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!