
doi: 10.1002/hed.23484
pmid: 23996729
handle: 11567/1307637 , 11381/2711894 , 2318/1796746 , 11586/472761
doi: 10.1002/hed.23484
pmid: 23996729
handle: 11567/1307637 , 11381/2711894 , 2318/1796746 , 11586/472761
AbstractBackgroundMandibular resection is the mainstay in the treatment of several pathologies involving the jaw. When benign lesions are approached, a limited exposure and less invasive access considering the cosmetic outcome is desirable to reduce morbidity and increase patient's quality of life after surgery. The facelift approach is widely used for rhytidectomy, parotidectomy, and facial animation procedures, whereas its use for mandibular resection and reconstruction is not described yet.MethodsSix patients underwent mandibular resection and reconstruction with free flaps or bone grafts via the facelift approach were retrospectively evaluated with regard to function and cosmesis.ResultsNo impairment of occlusion or facial nerve occurred; mouth opening was normal in 4 patient and partially limited in 2. Cosmesis was assessed as excellent by 3 patients and good in 3.ConclusionThe facelift approach is a valid option for resecting and reconstructing benign lesions involving the mandibular ramus, angle, and posterior body. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 36: 1497–1502, 2014
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Mandibular resection, Mandible, Middle Aged, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Facial Nerve, Mandibular Neoplasms, Young Adult, Mandibular reconstruction, Face lift, 616, 617, Humans, Facial reconstruction, Mandibular tumor, Female, Child, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Mandibular resection, Mandible, Middle Aged, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Facial Nerve, Mandibular Neoplasms, Young Adult, Mandibular reconstruction, Face lift, 616, 617, Humans, Facial reconstruction, Mandibular tumor, Female, Child, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
