
doi: 10.1002/hed.23270
pmid: 23900787
BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to present our evaluation of the relationship between the number of positive central lymph nodes and lateral lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC).MethodsUp to 141 patients with PTMC were divided into 3 groups according to different positive central lymph node classifications as follows: group A, no positive central lymph node; group B, 1 positive central lymph node; and group C, 2 or more positive central lymph nodes.ResultsIncidence of lateral lymph node metastasis was 30.5% (43 of 141). It was significantly high in group C compared with groups A and B, although there was no significant difference between groups A and B. Number of positive central lymph node ≥2, underlying Hashimoto thyroiditis, and extrathyroidal extension were the independent predictive factors for lateral lymph node metastasis on multivariate analysis.ConclusionLateral lymph node metastasis was mainly observed in patients with ≥2 positive central lymph nodes, which is an independent predictive factor for lateral lymph node metastasis. Therefore, ≥2 positive central lymph nodes may be valuable in predicting lateral lymph node metastasis. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 36: 101–106, 2014
Adult, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Carcinoma, Papillary, Cohort Studies, Logistic Models, Predictive Value of Tests, Lymphatic Metastasis, Multivariate Analysis, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Humans, Lymph Node Excision, Female, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Lymph Nodes, Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Carcinoma, Papillary, Cohort Studies, Logistic Models, Predictive Value of Tests, Lymphatic Metastasis, Multivariate Analysis, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Humans, Lymph Node Excision, Female, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Lymph Nodes, Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 42 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
