Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Head & Neckarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Head & Neck
Article . 2011 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
Head & Neck
Article . 2012
UQ eSpace
Article . 2011
Data sources: UQ eSpace
UQ eSpace
Article . 2011
Data sources: UQ eSpace
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Results of a prospective study of positron emission tomography–directed management of residual nodal abnormalities in node‐positive head and neck cancer after definitive radiotherapy with or without systemic therapy

Authors: V. Porceddu, Sandro; I. Pryor, David; Burmeister, Elizabeth; Burmeister, Bryan H.; G. Poulsen, Michael; C. Foote, Matthew; Panizza, Benedict; +3 Authors

Results of a prospective study of positron emission tomography–directed management of residual nodal abnormalities in node‐positive head and neck cancer after definitive radiotherapy with or without systemic therapy

Abstract

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to present our prospectively evaluated positron emission tomography (PET)‐directed policy for managing the neck in node‐positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (N+HNSCC) after definitive radiotherapy (RT) with or without concurrent systemic therapy. Methods One hundred twelve consecutive patients who achieved a complete response at the primary site underwent a 12‐week posttherapy nodal response assessment with PET and diagnostic CT. Patients with an equivocal PET underwent a repeat PET 4 to 6 weeks later. Patients with residual CT nodal abnormalities deemed PET‐negative were uniformly observed regardless of residual nodal size. Results Median follow‐up from commencement of RT was 28 months (range, 13–64 months). Residual CT nodal abnormalities were present in 50 patients (45%): 41 PET‐negative and 9 PET‐positive. All PET‐negative residual CT nodal abnormalities were observed without subsequent isolated nodal failure. Conclusion PET‐directed management of the neck after definitive RT in node‐positive HNSCC appropriately spares neck dissections in patients with PET‐negative residual CT nodal abnormalities. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2011

Keywords

Adult, Male, Clinical Sciences, Antineoplastic Agents, Head and neck, Squamous cell carcinoma, Chemotherapy, Humans, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Radiotherapy, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck, Pharyngeal Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Pet, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Dentistry, Lymphatic Metastasis, Positron-Emission Tomography, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Female, Medical and Health Sciences not elsewhere classified, Cisplatin, Radiotherapy, Conformal, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Neck

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    162
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
162
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 1%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!