
doi: 10.1002/hed.21474
pmid: 20665743
AbstractBackgroundUltrasound is routinely used in evaluating thyroid nodules and performing fine‐needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). Occasionally, nonthyroidal lesions can mimic thyroid nodules on imaging and get wrongly aspirated.MethodsA 63‐year‐old woman was reported to have an incidental left thyroid “nodule” on neck ultrasound scan. It was isoechoic with a surrounding hypoechoic rim and contained tiny foci of echogenicity. Similar findings were noted in a second surgeon‐performed ultrasound scan.ResultsAn ultrasound‐guided FNAC showed abundant squamous cells, bacteria, and vegetable cells with no evidence of thyroid cells or colloid. The suspicion of a pharyngoesophageal diverticulum was confirmed on barium swallow. She remained asymptomatic with no increase in size at 6 months follow‐up.ConclusionA pharyngoesophageal diverticulum can be mistaken for a posteriorly placed “thyroid nodule” on ultrasound scan if the subtle differentiating signs are missed. An awareness of this condition is important to avoid unnecessary needle biopsies. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2010
Zenker Diverticulum, Biopsy, Fine-Needle, 610, needle biopsy, Middle Aged, pharyngoesophageal diverticulum, Diagnosis, Differential, thyroid nodule, 616, cytology, Humans, Female, Thyroid Nodule, neck ultrasound, Ultrasonography
Zenker Diverticulum, Biopsy, Fine-Needle, 610, needle biopsy, Middle Aged, pharyngoesophageal diverticulum, Diagnosis, Differential, thyroid nodule, 616, cytology, Humans, Female, Thyroid Nodule, neck ultrasound, Ultrasonography
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
