
doi: 10.1002/hed.21175
pmid: 19691027
AbstractBackgroundReview of the literature reveals considerable variability in the definitions and criteria used for reporting postoperative hypocalcemia. The lack of standardization prevents a meaningful comparison of results and performance locally with the national standard. It also prevents the pooling of data when performing meta‐analysis, and may affect the comparison of research results.MethodsA literature review was performed to identify the different definitions used to define hypocalcemia in post‐thyroidectomy patients. We analyzed the incidence of hypocalcemia in the same cohort of 202 post thyroidectomy patients using these definitions.ResultsThe reported hypocalcemia rates varied from 0% to 46% for the same cohort depending on the definition of hypocalcemia used. Only one‐third of biochemically hypocalcemic patients requested calcium supplementation.ConclusionThis study demonstrates the need for more uniformity and standardization in the definitions used for reporting hypocalcemia rates. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2010
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Hypocalcemia, Incidence, Middle Aged, Thyroid Diseases, Cohort Studies, Young Adult, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Thyroidectomy, Humans, Calcium, Female, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Hypocalcemia, Incidence, Middle Aged, Thyroid Diseases, Cohort Studies, Young Adult, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Thyroidectomy, Humans, Calcium, Female, Aged, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 123 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
