
doi: 10.1002/hed.21102
pmid: 19536852
AbstractBackground.Significant morbidity is associated with management of anterior skull base neoplasms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the posttreatment patient's quality of life (QOL).Methods.A retrospective chart review identified 27 patients. QOL tools included the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Head & Neck, Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES‐D), Atkinson Life Happiness Rating (ALHR), and Midface Dysfunction Scale (MDS).Results.Postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy was required in 16 and 2 patients, respectively. The median FACT, ALHR, and CES‐D scores were 118 ± 21, 9 ± 2, and 17 ± 8, respectively. Smell and nasal crusting disturbance was reported by 69% and 61%, respectively. CES‐D > 16 and patients with recurrent disease correlated with a lower Total‐FACT score. Adjuvant radiotherapy correlated with a lower FACT‐H&N score. Patient sex, marital‐status, pathology, surgical technique, or complication rate did not correlate with worse QOL.Conclusion.Anterior skull base neoplasms survivors have an overall acceptable QOL. Most complaints relate to MDS. Recurrence, adjuvant radiotherapy, and MDS had lower QOL scores. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2009
Adult, Male, Psychometrics, Esthesioneuroblastoma, Olfactory, Middle Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Skull Base Neoplasms, Treatment Outcome, Quality of Life, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Female, Postoperative Period, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Male, Psychometrics, Esthesioneuroblastoma, Olfactory, Middle Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Skull Base Neoplasms, Treatment Outcome, Quality of Life, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Female, Postoperative Period, Aged, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 38 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
