
doi: 10.1002/hec.3081
pmid: 25048534
SummaryUnder Medicare Part B, adjustments to the fee schedule are made under the assumption that physicians and hospitals make up for fee reductions through increased service provision called ‘volume offsetting’. While historically, researchers have found evidence of volume offsetting, more recent studies have called into question its magnitude and existence. This study is the first to propose and empirically evaluate an alternative hypothesis of offsetting, namely the alteration of billed or provided services as a means of ‘intensity offsetting’. Evaluating both forms of offsetting, it finds strong evidence of intensity offsetting and little to no evidence of volume offsetting. Simulating a 10% reduction in the Medicare fee schedule, this study estimates that across different procedures between 22% and 59% of a fee reduction will be offset through alterations in service intensity. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Economics, Finance and Financial Management, and Operations, United States, Management, Reimbursement Mechanisms, Fee Schedules, Humans, Medicare Part B, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Finance, Models, Econometric, Business Administration
Economics, Finance and Financial Management, and Operations, United States, Management, Reimbursement Mechanisms, Fee Schedules, Humans, Medicare Part B, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Finance, Models, Econometric, Business Administration
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
