
AbstractThis study aims to measure the causal effect of informal caregiving on the health and health care use of women who are caregivers, using instrumental variables. We use data from South Korea, where daughters and daughters‐in‐law are the prevalent source of caregivers for frail elderly parents and parents‐in‐law. A key insight of our instrumental variable approach is that having a parent‐in‐law with functional limitations increases the probability of providing informal care to that parent‐in‐law, but a parent‐in‐law's functional limitation does not directly affect the daughter‐in‐law's health. We compare results for the daughter‐in‐law and daughter samples to check the assumption of the excludability of the instruments for the daughter sample. Our results show that providing informal care has significant adverse effects along multiple dimensions of health for daughter‐in‐law and daughter caregivers in South Korea. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Medicine (General), Time Factors, National Health Programs, Economics, Science, Health Status, Social Sciences, caregiver health, Business and Economics, Cost of Illness, Health Sciences, Activities of Daily Living, Republic of Korea, Humans, I10, Mobility Limitation, D10, Korea, Age Factors, Middle Aged, informal care, Statistics and Numeric Data, Caregivers, Socioeconomic Factors, instrumental variable estimation, Adult Children, Women's Health, Female, Public Health, Stress, Psychological, jel: jel:I1
Medicine (General), Time Factors, National Health Programs, Economics, Science, Health Status, Social Sciences, caregiver health, Business and Economics, Cost of Illness, Health Sciences, Activities of Daily Living, Republic of Korea, Humans, I10, Mobility Limitation, D10, Korea, Age Factors, Middle Aged, informal care, Statistics and Numeric Data, Caregivers, Socioeconomic Factors, instrumental variable estimation, Adult Children, Women's Health, Female, Public Health, Stress, Psychological, jel: jel:I1
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 112 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
