
doi: 10.1002/hec.2821
pmid: 22674841
ABSTRACTEconomic analyses of equity which focus solely on horizontal inequity offer a partial assessment of socioeconomic inequity in healthcare use. We analyse income‐related inequity in cardiovascular disease‐related healthcare utilisation by individuals reporting cardiovascular disease in England, including both horizontal and vertical aspects. For the analysis of vertical inequity, we use target groups to estimate the appropriate relationship between healthcare needs and use. We find that including vertical inequity considerations may lead us to draw different conclusions about the nature and extent of income‐related inequity. After accounting for vertical inequity in addition to horizontal inequity, there is no longer evidence of inequity favouring the poor for nurse visits, whereas there is some evidence that doctor visits and inpatient stays are concentrated among richer individuals. The estimates of income‐related inequity for outpatient visits, electrocardiography tests and heart surgery become even more pro‐rich when accounting for vertical inequity. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Male, Health Services Needs and Demand, Incidence, Age Factors, Health Services, Health Surveys, Health Services Accessibility, Cross-Sectional Studies, Sex Factors, England, Socioeconomic Factors, Cardiovascular Diseases, Income, Humans, Female, Healthcare Disparities
Male, Health Services Needs and Demand, Incidence, Age Factors, Health Services, Health Surveys, Health Services Accessibility, Cross-Sectional Studies, Sex Factors, England, Socioeconomic Factors, Cardiovascular Diseases, Income, Humans, Female, Healthcare Disparities
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
