
doi: 10.1002/hec.1336
pmid: 18189227
AbstractPromoting cessation is a cornerstone of tobacco control efforts by public‐health agencies. Economic information to support cessation programs has generally emphasized cost‐effectiveness or the impact of cigarette pricing and smoking restrictions on quit rates. In contrast, this study provides empirical estimates of smoker preferences for increased efficacy and other attributes of smoking cessation therapies (SCTs). Choice data were collected through a national survey of Canadian smokers. We find systematic preference heterogeneity for therapy types and SCT attributes between light and heavy smokers, as well as random heterogeneity using random parameters logit models. Preference heterogeneity is greatest between length of use and types of SCTs. We estimate that light smokers would be willing to pay nearly $500 ($CAN) to increase success rates to 40% with the comparable figure for heavy smokers being near $300 ($CAN). Results from this study can be used to inform research and development for smoking cessation products and programs and suggest important areas of future inquiry regarding heterogeneity of smoker preferences and preferences for other health programs. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Adult, Male, Likelihood Functions, Nicotine, Tobacco Use Disorder, Ganglionic Stimulants, Models, Biological, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors, Patient Satisfaction, Humans, Female, Smoking Cessation, Bupropion
Adult, Male, Likelihood Functions, Nicotine, Tobacco Use Disorder, Ganglionic Stimulants, Models, Biological, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors, Patient Satisfaction, Humans, Female, Smoking Cessation, Bupropion
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
