
doi: 10.1002/hec.1283
pmid: 18050147
AbstractThis paper empirically examines the diffusion of hospital information systems (ISs), specifically, pharmacy, laboratory, and radiology systems. Given the policy significance of health IS and the widespread perception that it's diffusion is slow, a better understanding of the mechanisms driving IS adoption is needed. A novel data set incorporating both IS adoption and hospital characteristics was constructed. These data follow the behavior of 1965 hospitals for the years 1990–2000. Hypotheses pertaining to hospital characteristics, hospital competition, and strategic behavior are tested utilizing proportional hazard models. I find that IS adoption is related to multi‐hospital system membership, payer mix, and hospital scale. The role of scale, however, significantly diminishes throughout the time period, likely reflecting improved personal computer performance and improved IT scalability. Conversely, I find little that strategic behavior or hospital competition affects IS adoption. Likewise, hospital ownership does not affect the adoption of these systems. Overall, these results suggest that hospital IS diffusion has not been normatively slow. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Hospital Administration, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Hospital Information Systems, Humans, Diffusion of Innovation, United States, Proportional Hazards Models
Hospital Administration, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Hospital Information Systems, Humans, Diffusion of Innovation, United States, Proportional Hazards Models
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 69 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
