The equilibrated Kt/V (eKtV) is widely used in hemodialysis (HD) as a measure of the intensity (magnitude) of an individual dialysis treatment. Adequate eKt/V for thrice‐weekly hemodialysis (twHD) has been extensively studied, and a value in the range 1.0 – 1.1 per treatment (3.0 – 3.3 weekly) is generally considered to represent adequate therapy for this specific frequency of dialysis. However, for other schedules, summing eKt/V's and time‐averaging the clearance is not appropriate. This was first demonstrated several years ago by the observation that a weekly eKt/V of 2.0 in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is therapeutically equal to a weekly eKt/V of 3.0 in twHD. That paradox has been resolved by the standard Kt/V (stdKt/V), which accounts for the first order nature of solute removal by dialysis, and which correctly predicts a normalized weekly stdKt/V of 2.0 for both CAPD and twHD.The equivalent renal clearance (EKR) has also been advanced as a method to normalize dose for varying treatment schedules. However, mathematical consideration shows that EKR is an exact time‐averaged clearance. Analysis of data reported for daily dialysis by Piccoli et al. in the present issue of Hemodialysis International shows that the EKRct/V calculated for daily dialysis is identical to the sum of eKt/V's for the individual dialyses. We therefore conclude that EKR is not a suitable parameter for normalizing the dialysis dose, because it fails to reflect the effect of dialysis frequency in HD therapy.