
AbstractThis article describes the combination of multivariate Granger causality analysis, temporal down‐sampling of fMRI time series, and graph theoretic concepts for investigating causal brain networks and their dynamics. As a demonstration, this approach was applied to analyze epoch‐to‐epoch changes in a hand‐gripping, muscle fatigue experiment. Causal influences between the activated regions were analyzed by applying the directed transfer function (DTF) analysis of multivariate Granger causality with the integrated epoch response as the input, allowing us to account for the effects of several relevant regions simultaneously. Integrated responses were used in lieu of originally sampled time points to remove the effect of the spatially varying hemodynamic response as a confounding factor; using integrated responses did not affect our ability to capture its slowly varying affects of fatigue. We separately modeled the early, middle, and late periods in the fatigue. We adopted graph theoretic concepts of clustering and eccentricity to facilitate the interpretation of the resultant complex networks. Our results reveal the temporal evolution of the network and demonstrate that motor fatigue leads to a disconnection in the related neural network. Hum Brain Mapp, 2009. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Brain Mapping, Time Factors, Models, Neurological, Brain, Motor Activity, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Causality, Oxygen, Multivariate Analysis, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Cluster Analysis, Humans, Computer Simulation, Nerve Net
Brain Mapping, Time Factors, Models, Neurological, Brain, Motor Activity, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Causality, Oxygen, Multivariate Analysis, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Cluster Analysis, Humans, Computer Simulation, Nerve Net
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 213 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
