
doi: 10.1002/gps.5371
pmid: 32584472
AbstractObjectivesDementia severity is strongly related to Spearman's general intelligence factor “g”, via the latent dementia phenotype “δ” and is distinct from domain‐specific cognitive impairments arising from disease‐specific regional pathologies. It is an empiric question whether behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are associated with δ or with domain‐specific constructs.MethodsA recently developed δ homolog (”dDx”) was tested as a predictor of 1 year prospective BPSD in n = 723 Mexican‐American and non‐Hispanic White participants in the Texas Alzheimer's Research and Care Consortium (TARCC). The informant‐rated frequencies of 12 BPSD were rated by the neuropsychiatric inventory (NPI‐Q). Baseline BPSD, demographic features, selected biomarkers, and treatment exposure to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors were used as covariates. Composite scores derived from orthogonal latent measures of domain‐specific memory (MEM) and executive function (EF) were also tested as predictors.Results“Functionally salient cognitive impairment (FSCI)” that is, categorical “dementia” as diagnosed by dDx was associated with increased prospective frequency of 11/12 BPSD, independently of baseline behavior and covariates. Age, depressive symptoms, and EF were associated with individual BPSD. MEM was not associated with any. Dementia severity, as measured by dDx, was also associated with a prospective increase in total NPI‐Q scores.Conclusionδ is associated non‐specifically with multiple BPSD. This suggests the existence of a dementia‐specific behavioral profile, arising from insults to general intelligence, and unrelated to disease‐specific regional pathology(ies).
Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Cognitive Dysfunction, Behavioral Symptoms, Prospective Studies, Neuropsychological Tests, Texas
Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Cognitive Dysfunction, Behavioral Symptoms, Prospective Studies, Neuropsychological Tests, Texas
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
