
doi: 10.1002/glr2.70010
AbstractBackgroundThis study addresses the degradation of shrub ecosystems and emphasizes the essential role that shrubs play within ecological systems. The use of advanced technological methods to swiftly and accurately capture information on shrub disturbance is crucial for preserving ecological security.MethodsUtilizing the LandTrendr temporal segmentation algorithm on the Google Earth Engine cloud platform, and grounded in land cover data, we conducted dynamic monitoring of shrubland change across the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau from 1990 to 2022.ResultsFrom 1990 to 2022, the cumulative total area of shrub disturbance in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau amounted to 372.23 km2, primarily concentrated in the eastern and southeastern regions, with an overall decreasing trend observed. The duration of shrub disturbance was predominantly concentrated within a 1–2‐year period, covering approximately 80.43% of the total disturbed area. Pixel‐scale validation indicated an overall accuracy of 95.71%, with a Kappa coefficient of 0.93. User's accuracy for each year surpassed 73.82% and producer's accuracy was above 70.08%. Shrub disturbance on the Tibetan Plateau is mainly concentrated in areas with an altitude of 2000–4000 m, a slope gradient of 15°−40°, and a shady slope aspect. Shrub disturbance shows a moderately significant negative correlation with temperature (r = −0.436, p < 0.05) and a weakly significant positive correlation with precipitation (r = 0.124, p < 0.05), respectively.ConclusionsIncorporating contextual data, the study identified climate, and topography as primary factors driving shrub disturbance. This study offers valuable scientific evidence and methodological references for monitoring large‐scale shrub dynamics.
shrub disturbance, Agriculture (General), Google Earth Engine (GEE), Plant culture, time series, LandTrendr, S1-972, SB1-1110
shrub disturbance, Agriculture (General), Google Earth Engine (GEE), Plant culture, time series, LandTrendr, S1-972, SB1-1110
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
