
doi: 10.1002/glr2.12104
AbstractBackgroundDespite its importance to animal production potential, genetic gain for forage nutritive value has been limited in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) breeding. The objective of this study was to phenotype a training population and develop prediction models to assess the potential of predicting organic matter digestibility (OMD) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) with genotyping‐by‐sequencing data.MethodsNear infra‐red reflectance spectroscopy calibrations for OMD and NDF were developed and used to phenotype a spaced plant training population of n = 1606, with matching genotype‐by‐sequencing data, for developing genomic selection models. families derived from the training population were also evaluated for OMD and NDF in sward plots and used to empirically validate prediction models.ResultsSufficient genotypic variation exists in breeding populations to improve forage nutritive value, and spectral bands contributing to calibrations were identified. OMD and NDF can be predicted from genomic data with moderate accuracy (predictive ability in the range of 0.51–0.59 and 0.33–0.57, respectively) and models developed on individual plants outperform those developed from family means. Encouragingly, genomic prediction models developed on parental plants can predict OMD in subsequent generations grown as competitive swards.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that genetic improvement in forage nutritive value can be accelerated through the application of genomic prediction models.
precision agriculture, Agriculture (General), grass nutritive value, plant breeding, Plant culture, S1-972, SB1-1110
precision agriculture, Agriculture (General), grass nutritive value, plant breeding, Plant culture, S1-972, SB1-1110
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
