
doi: 10.1002/fut.20397
handle: 1893/1744
AbstractWe study the pricing of reverse convertible (RC) bonds. These are bonds that carry high coupon payments. In exchange, the issuer has an option at the maturity date to either redeem the bonds in cash or to deliver a pre‐specified number of shares. We find that Dutch plain vanilla and knock‐in RC bonds are, on average, overpriced by almost 6%. This overpricing is confirmed in a model‐free analysis with respect to option‐ and bond‐pricing models. We find that rational factors explain 23% of the documented overpricing. In addition, we find that the combination of financial marketing, framing, and the representativeness bias further increases our ability to explain the documented overpricing to more than 35%. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 29:895–919, 2009
reverse exchangeable securities, Convertible bonds, 330, structured products, reverse convertible bonds, Stock warrants
reverse exchangeable securities, Convertible bonds, 330, structured products, reverse convertible bonds, Stock warrants
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 37 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
