
doi: 10.1002/fld.799
Summary: A new method for departure point determination on Cartesian grids, the semi-analytical upwind path line tracing (SUT) method, is presented and compared to two typical departure point determination methods used in semi-Lagrangian advection schemes, the Euler method and the four-step Runge-Kutta method. Rigorous comparisons of the three methods were conducted for a severely curving hypothetical flow field and for advective transport in the rotation of a Gaussian concentration hill. The SUT method was shown to have equivalent accuracy to the Runge-Kutta method but with significantly improved computational efficiency. Depending on the case being simulated, the SUT method provides either far greater or equivalent computational efficiency and more certain accuracy than the Euler method.
Other numerical methods (fluid mechanics), departure point determination, semi-Lagrangian advection
Other numerical methods (fluid mechanics), departure point determination, semi-Lagrangian advection
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
