
doi: 10.1002/fld.448
AbstractA heterogeneous domain decomposition approach is followed to simulate the unsteady wavy flow generated by a body moving beneath a free surface. Attention being focused on complex free surface configurations, including wave‐breaking phenomena, a two‐fluid viscous flow model is used in the free surface region to capture the air–water interface (via a level‐set technique), while a potential flow approximation is adopted to describe the flow far from the interface. Two coupling strategies are investigated, differing in the transmission conditions. Both the adopted approaches make use of the inviscid velocity field as boundary condition in the Navier–Stokes solution.For validation purposes, two different two‐dimensional non‐breaking flows are simulated. Domain decomposition results are compared with both fully viscous and fully inviscid results, obtained by solving the corresponding equations in the whole fluid domain, and with available experimental data. Finally, the unsteady evolution of a steep breaking wave is followed and some of the physical phenomena, experimentally observed, are reproduced. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
domain decomposition, Multigrid methods; domain decomposition for boundary value problems involving PDEs, wave breaking, Navier-Stokes equations for incompressible viscous fluids, Finite volume methods applied to problems in fluid mechanics, free surface flow, Other free boundary flows; Hele-Shaw flows, level set
domain decomposition, Multigrid methods; domain decomposition for boundary value problems involving PDEs, wave breaking, Navier-Stokes equations for incompressible viscous fluids, Finite volume methods applied to problems in fluid mechanics, free surface flow, Other free boundary flows; Hele-Shaw flows, level set
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 43 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
