
doi: 10.1002/fld.329
AbstractA method for modelling of flow discontinuities based on deconvolution with a relaxation regularization (DDM) is compared with an essentially non‐oscillatory scheme (ENO) without further modelling and with a dynamic Smagorinsky subgrid‐scale model (DSM). For the DDM approach, a sufficiently accurate representation of the filtered non‐linear combination of discontinuous solution components which arise from the convection term is obtained by regularized deconvolution applied to the filtered solution. For stable integration the evolution equations are supplemented by a relaxation regularization based on a secondary filter operation and a relaxation parameter. We apply the above method to the generic test case of a two‐dimensional solenoidal velocity fluctuation field interacting with a normal shock. The results demonstrate a good agreement of DDM with a reference computation, while DDM significantly reduces computational cost. Predictions with DDM are found to provide a more accurate representation of the shock–vorticity–wave interaction phenomena than that which can be accomplished using the ENO scheme with or without subgrid‐scale model. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
shock capturing, large-eddy simulation, Compressibility effects in turbulence, subgrid-scale modeling, compressible flows, Direct numerical and large eddy simulation of turbulence, deconvolution, Shock waves and blast waves in fluid mechanics, Finite difference methods applied to problems in fluid mechanics
shock capturing, large-eddy simulation, Compressibility effects in turbulence, subgrid-scale modeling, compressible flows, Direct numerical and large eddy simulation of turbulence, deconvolution, Shock waves and blast waves in fluid mechanics, Finite difference methods applied to problems in fluid mechanics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
