
doi: 10.1002/fld.2365
AbstractArbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) methods are commonly used for challenging problems in hydrodynamics. Among the most challenging matters are the approximations in the presence of multiple materials. The ALE code ALEGRA has used a constant volume method for computing the impact of multiple materials on both the Lagrangian step and the remap step of the method. Here, we describe modifications to these methods that provide greater modeling fidelity and better numerical and computational performance. In the Lagrangian step, the effects of differences in material response were not included in the constant volume method, but have been included in the new method. The new methodology can produce unstable results unless the changes in the variable states are carefully controlled. Both the stability analysis and the control of the instability are described. In the standard (Van Leer) method for the remap, the numerical approximation did not account for the presence of a material interface directly. The new methodology uses different, more stable and more dissipative numerical approximations in and near material interfaces. In addition, the standard numerical method, which is second‐order accurate, has been replaced by a more accurate method, which is third‐order accurate in one dimension. Published in 2010 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
constant volume method, Basic methods in fluid mechanics, Multiphase and multicomponent flows, dissipation, stability, remapping arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian method
constant volume method, Basic methods in fluid mechanics, Multiphase and multicomponent flows, dissipation, stability, remapping arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian method
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
