
doi: 10.1002/etc.3987
pmid: 28926123
Abstract Organs and tissues of whitefish and trout from mercury (Hg)-polluted Lake Ontario were analyzed for Hg isotopes, methylmercury (CH3Hg+), and inorganic Hg to investigate possible mass-dependent fractionation (MDF) and mass-independent fractionation (MIF) of Hg isotopes by physiological processes of the fish. Isotope signatures of different body parts were defined by δ-values of 198Hg/202Hg, 199Hg/202Hg, 200Hg/202Hg, and 201Hg/202Hg ratios and by Δ-values representing effects of MIF on 199Hg/202Hg and 201Hg/202Hg ratios. The research yielded the following evidence for MDF and MIF, including MIF of isotopes with even as well as odd mass numbers, by metabolic activities: 1) anomalously low δ-values for whitefish kidneys but not for trout kidneys; 2) widely varying differences between the δ-values of different body parts of whitefish but practically uniform differences for those of trout; 3) different relationships between Δ199Hg and Δ201Hg for whitefish than for trout; 4) nonlinear correlation between δ198Hg and δ200Hg for whitefish but linear correlation for trout; 5) an inverse correlation between the δ199Hg values and CH3Hg+ concentrations of whitefish and trout; 6) an inverse correlation between the δ201Hg/δ199Hg and CH3Hg+/inorganic Hg ratios of trout kidneys and gills (and lipids of trout near the sources of pollution) but a positive correlation for muscle, liver, and gut; and 7) inverse correlations between Δ199Hg and the CH3Hg+/inorganic Hg ratio for trout liver, kidneys, and gut. Environ Toxicol Chem 2018;37:515–529. © 2017 SETAC
Male, Ontario, Geography, Trout, Water Pollution, Mercury, Chemical Fractionation, Methylmercury Compounds, Lakes, Mercury Isotopes, Organ Specificity, Animals, Female, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Environmental Monitoring
Male, Ontario, Geography, Trout, Water Pollution, Mercury, Chemical Fractionation, Methylmercury Compounds, Lakes, Mercury Isotopes, Organ Specificity, Animals, Female, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Environmental Monitoring
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
