
doi: 10.1002/eqe.2600
handle: 11588/635533
SummaryThe seismic damage of internal partitions may cause significant earthquake loss; this phenomenon is caused by (a) their tendency to exhibit damage for low demand levels and (b) the consequent loss of inventory and breakdown that their collapse can cause.Quasi‐static tests are performed on six 5‐m‐high plasterboard internal partitions, which represent typical partitions in industrial and commercial buildings in the European area. A steel test setup is designed to transfer the load, which is provided by the actuator, to the partition. The testing protocol provided by Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 461 is adopted for the quasi‐static tests.The typical failure mode of the specimens is the buckling of a steel stud, which involves the boards that are attached to the buckled stud. The buckling failure usually concentrates across the plasterboard horizontal joints. A frictional behavior is exhibited for low demand levels, whereas a pinched behavior is shown for moderate‐to‐high demand levels.The interstory drift ratios required to reach a given damage limit state are evaluated using a predefined damage scheme. Based on the experimental data, the fragility curves for three different damage states (DS1, DS2, and DS3) are estimated. The fragility curve yields median interstory drift ratio values of 0.28%, 0.81%, and 2.05% and logarithmic standard deviations of 0.39, 0.42, and 0.46 for DS1, DS2, and DS3, respectively. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
nonstructural components, Fragility curves, seismicperformance, Internal partitions, quasi-static test, fragility curves, Quasi-static test, internal partitions, Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology, Nonstructural components, testing protocol, Seismic performance, Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous), Fragility curves; Internal partitions; Nonstructural components; Quasi-static test; Seismic performance; Testing protocol; Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous); Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology, Testing protocol
nonstructural components, Fragility curves, seismicperformance, Internal partitions, quasi-static test, fragility curves, Quasi-static test, internal partitions, Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology, Nonstructural components, testing protocol, Seismic performance, Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous), Fragility curves; Internal partitions; Nonstructural components; Quasi-static test; Seismic performance; Testing protocol; Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous); Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology, Testing protocol
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 40 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
