
doi: 10.1002/epd2.20014
pmid: 37358914
AbstractObjectiveContrary to patients, the psychological impact of functional seizures to caregivers has not been adequately investigated. This study aimed to evaluate the rates and determinants of depression and anxiety in caregivers of patients with functional seizures.MethodsPatients with functional seizures and their caregivers completed surveys about demographic, disease‐related, and psychosocial characteristics. Rates and determinants of depression and anxiety were evaluated using the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventory scores as dependent variables and patient and caregiver characteristics as independent variables.ResultsTwenty‐nine patients (76% female, mean age of 37 years) and their caregivers (59% female, mean age of 43 years) were recruited. Symptoms of anxiety and/or depression were present in 96% of patients (96% depression, 92% anxiety) and 59% of caregivers (52% depression, 50% anxiety). Specifically, 31% of caregivers manifested mild depression, 14% moderate depression, and 7% severe depression, whereas 48% were not depressed. Similarly, 14% of caregivers manifested mild anxiety, 29% moderate anxiety, and 7% severe anxiety, whereas 50% were not anxious. Patient and caregiver depression levels strongly correlated (r = .73, p < .0001). The presence of anxiety and depression in the caregiver was associated with male patient gender (p = .02), patient depression level (p = .002), the caregiver being a parent or sibling (p = .02), and caregiver burden (p = .0009).SignificanceCaregivers of patients with functional seizures experience high rates of anxiety and depression, explained by specific demographic and psychosocial factors that could act as intervention targets.
Male, Adult, Caregivers, Depression, Seizures, Surveys and Questionnaires, Quality of Life, Humans, Female, Anxiety
Male, Adult, Caregivers, Depression, Seizures, Surveys and Questionnaires, Quality of Life, Humans, Female, Anxiety
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
