
The present work deals with the development and validation of a novel dual CD‐MEKC system for the systematic flavonoid fingerprinting of Ligaria cuneifolia (R. et P.) Tiegh.—Loranthaceae—extracts. The BGE consisted of 20 mM pH 8.3 borate buffer, 50 mM SDS, a dual CD system based on the combination of 5 mM β‐CD and 2% w/v S‐β‐CD, and 10% v/v methanol. The proposed method has been successfully applied to the comparative analysis of extracts from aerial parts and different hosts, geographical areas, and extraction procedures in order to establish the flavonoid fingerprint of L. cuneifolia. The method was validated according to international guidelines. LOD and LOQ, intra and interday precision, and linearity were determined for catechin, epicatechin, procyanidin B2, rutin, quercetin‐3‐O‐glucoside, quercetin‐3‐O‐xyloside, quercetin‐3‐O‐rhamnoside, quercetin‐3‐O‐arabinofuranoside, quercetin‐3‐O‐arabinopyranoside, and quercetin. The CD‐MEKC methodology emerges as a suitable alternative to the traditional HPLC for quality control, fingerprinting, and standardization of L. cuneifolia extracts from different sources.
Flavonoids, Plant Extracts, Cd-Mekc, Reproducibility of Results, Loranthaceae, Ligaria Cuneifolia, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.3, Limit of Detection, Linear Models, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3, Fingerprinting, Chromatography, Micellar Electrokinetic Capillary
Flavonoids, Plant Extracts, Cd-Mekc, Reproducibility of Results, Loranthaceae, Ligaria Cuneifolia, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.3, Limit of Detection, Linear Models, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3, Fingerprinting, Chromatography, Micellar Electrokinetic Capillary
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
