Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Electrophoresisarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Electrophoresis
Article . 2008 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
Electrophoresis
Article . 2008
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Miniaturizing free‐flow electrophoresis – a critical review

Authors: Kohlheyer, D.; Eijkel, Jan C.T.; van den Berg, Albert; Schasfoort, Richardus B.M.;

Miniaturizing free‐flow electrophoresis – a critical review

Abstract

AbstractFree‐flow electrophoresis (FFE) separation methods have been developed and investigated for around 50 years and have been applied not only to many types of analytes for various biomedical applications, but also for the separation of inorganic and organic substances. Its continuous sample preparation and mild separation conditions make it also interesting for online monitoring and detection applications. Since 1994 several microfluidic, miniaturized FFE devices were developed and experimentally characterized. In contrast to their large‐scale counterparts microfluidic FFE (μ‐FFE) devices offer new possibilities due to the very rapid separations within several seconds or below and the requirement for sample volumes in the microliter range. Eventually, these μ‐FFE systems might find application in so‐called lab‐on‐a‐chip devices for real‐time monitoring and separation applications. This review gives detailed information on the results so far published on μ‐FFE chips, comprising its four main modes, namely free‐flow zone electrophoresis (FFZE), free‐flow IEF (FFIEF), free‐flow ITP (FFITP), and free‐flow field‐step electrophoresis (FFFSE). The principles of the different FFE modes and the basic underlying theory are given and discussed with special emphasis on miniaturization. Different designs as well as fabrication methods and applied materials are discussed and evaluated. Furthermore, the separation results shown indicate that similar separation quality with respect to conventional FFE systems, as defined by the resolution and peak capacity, can be achieved with μ‐FFE separations when applying much lower electrical voltages. Furthermore, innovations still occur and several approaches for hyphenated, more integrated systems have been proposed so far, some of which are discussed here. This review is intended as an introduction and early compendium for research and development within this field.

Country
Netherlands
Related Organizations
Keywords

Electrophoresis, Miniaturization, Rhodamines, EWI-12153, METIS-250921, Microfluidic Analytical Techniques, Models, Theoretical, Amino Acids, Isoelectric Focusing, Electrodes, IR-60698, Fluorescent Dyes

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    166
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
166
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 1%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!