
pmid: 16850505
AbstractIn this study, anion‐selective exhaustive injection‐sweeping (ASEI‐sweeping) technique, which is a selective on‐line sample concentration technique, was first proposed in microemulsion electrokinetic chromatography (MEEKC) for analyses of eight acidic phenolic compounds. In contrast to a capillary that is typically filled with nonmicellar background solution in conventional ASEI‐sweeping MEKC method, in the proposed ASEI‐sweeping MEEKC method, a capillary is filled with a low pH microemulsion solution (pH 2.0), and then with a short acid plug (pH 2.0, 1.9 cm) before field‐amplified sample injection. This proposed design has two functions. First, the microemulsion solution that is present at the front of capillary column is able to avoid phase separation of microemulsion solution during MEEKC separation. Second, the presence of the short acid plug would effectively limit the partition behavior of acid analytes with the oil droplets in the microemulsion during field‐amplified sample injection; otherwise, the stacking effect of acid analytes would be markedly reduced. This optimal ASEI‐sweeping MEEKC method afforded about 96 000‐fold to 238 000‐fold increases in detection sensitivity in terms of peak areas without any separation efficiency loss when compared to normal MEEKC separation. Furthermore, trace levels (about 3 ng/g) of gallic acid and catechin in foods were also detected successfully by the proposed ASEI‐sweeping MEEKC technique.
Anions, Phenols, Gallic Acid, Electrophoresis, Capillary, Emulsions, Acids, Online Systems, Sensitivity and Specificity, Catechin, Food Analysis, Chromatography, Liquid
Anions, Phenols, Gallic Acid, Electrophoresis, Capillary, Emulsions, Acids, Online Systems, Sensitivity and Specificity, Catechin, Food Analysis, Chromatography, Liquid
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 38 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
