Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao European Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
European Journal of Immunology
Article . 1997 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Crucial role of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor 2 and membrane‐bound TNF in experimental cerebral malaria

Authors: Lucas R; Juillard P; Decoster E; Redard M; Burger D; Donati Y; Giroud C; +8 Authors

Crucial role of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor 2 and membrane‐bound TNF in experimental cerebral malaria

Abstract

AbstractTumor necrosis factor (TNF) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of experimental cerebral malaria (CM), but the respective role of its two types of receptors has not been established. A significant increase in the expression of TNF‐receptor 2 (TNFR2, p75), but not of TNFR1 (p55), was found on brain microvessels at the time of CM in susceptible animals. Moreover, mice genetically deficient for TNFR2 (Tnfr2°) were significantly protected from experimental CM, in contrast to TNFR1‐deficient (Tnfr1°) mice, which were as susceptible as wild‐type mice. To identify the factors involved in the protection from CM conferred by the lack of TNFR2, we assessed in both knockout and control mice the serum concentrations of mediators that are critical for the development of CM, as well as the up‐regulation of intercellular adhesion molecule‐1 (ICAM‐1) in the brain microvessels. No significant difference in serum levels of TNF and interferon‐γ was found between infected wild‐type and Tnfr1° or Tnfr2° mice. Interestingly, the pronounced ICAM‐1 up‐regulation and leukocyte sequestration, typically occurring in brain microvessels of CM‐susceptible animals, was detected in infected control and Tnfr1° mice – both of which developed CM – whereas no such ICAM‐1 up‐regulation or leukocyte sequestration was observed in Tnfr2° mice, which were protected from CM. Making use of microvascular endothelium cells (MVEC) isolated from wild‐type, Tnfr1° or Tnfr2° mice, we show that soluble TNF requires the presence of both TNF receptors, whereas membrane‐bound TNF only needs TNFR2 for TNF‐mediated ICAM‐1 up‐regulation in brain MVEC. Thus, only in MVEC lacking TNFR2, neither membrane‐bound nor soluble TNF cause the up‐regulation of ICAM‐1 in vitro. In conclusion, these results indicate that the interaction between membrane TNF and TNFR2 is crucial in the development of this neurological syndrome.

Country
Netherlands
Keywords

Male, Plasmodium berghei, Malaria, Cerebral, Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Interferon-gamma, Mice, Antigens, CD, Animals, Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type II, Mice, Knockout, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Microcirculation, Cell Membrane, Brain, Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1, Immunity, Innate, Up-Regulation, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Solubility, Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type I, Mice, Inbred CBA, Endothelium, Vascular

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    167
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
167
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 1%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!