Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao European Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
European Journal of Immunology
Article . 1996 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Interferon‐γ and interleukin‐10 inhibit antigen presentation by Langerhans cells for T helper type 1 cells by suppressing their CD80 (B7‐1) expression

Authors: H, Ozawa; S, Aiba; , Nakagawa; H, Tagami;

Interferon‐γ and interleukin‐10 inhibit antigen presentation by Langerhans cells for T helper type 1 cells by suppressing their CD80 (B7‐1) expression

Abstract

AbstractCD80(B7‐1) and CD86(B7‐2) co‐stimulatory molecules have been reported to activate Th1/Th2 development pathways differentially. It is well known that Langerhans cells (LC), potent antigen‐presenting dendritic cells in the epidermis, express several co‐stimulatory molecules and that this expression is modulated by several cytokines. Based on the recently reported effect of interferon (IFN)‐γ and interleukin (IL)‐10 on the expression of CD80 and CD86 by LC, we examined the effects of these cytokines on the expression of CD54 (intercellular adhesion molecule‐1) and CD40 in addition to CD80 and CD86 on LC, and correlated the expression of each co‐stimulatory molecule with antigen presentation for a Th1 clone by cultured LC (cLC) treated with these cytokines. LC cultured for 72 h significantly up‐regulated MHC class II antigen expression and all the co‐stimulatory molecules we examined. As previously reported, IL‐10 or IFN‐γ inhibited the up‐regulation of CD80 expression. Granulocyte/macrophage‐colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) partially restored the suppression of CD80 expression induced by IFN‐γ on cultured LC, while it had virtually no effect on the inhibition induced by IL‐10. Antigen presentation for the myoglobin‐specific syngeneic Th1 clone by cLC, which were pre‐incubated with these cytokines, correlated well with their CD80 expression. In addition, among the antibodies for CD80, CD86, CD28 or CD40, the suppression of the Th1 clone stimulation by LC was found to occur only with anti‐CD80 and anti‐CD28 antibodies. Finally, we studied the effects of IFN‐γ and IL‐10 on GM‐CSF production by epidermal keratinocytes (KC). We could show that only IFN‐γ, but not IL‐10, suppressed GM‐CSF production by KC. These findings suggest that both IFN‐γ and IL‐10 suppress antigen presentation by LC for Th1 cells by suppressing their CD80 expression. The inhibitory effect of IFN‐γ on CD80 expression on LC appears to be partially mediated through the suppression of GM‐CSF production by KC.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Keratinocytes, Antigen Presentation, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Membrane Glycoproteins, Mice, Inbred A, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor, Th1 Cells, Interleukin-10, Interferon-gamma, Mice, CD28 Antigens, Antigens, CD, Langerhans Cells, B7-1 Antigen, Animals, Female, B7-2 Antigen, CD40 Antigens, Immunosuppressive Agents

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    99
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
99
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 1%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!