
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>pmid: 1902181
AbstractIn the present study we have examined the possibility that CD4 and CD8 accessory molecules can be passively acquired by thymocytes. We initially observed that most thymocytes contained within the CD4−CD8− subset actually possess low levels of CD4 and CD8 on their cell surface. However, the detection of CD4 and CD8 on CD4−CD8− cells was dependent on the presence of other CD4+/CD8+ thymocytes which were actively synthesizing CD4 and CD8. These initial findings suggested that the appearance of CD4/CD8 on “double‐negative” thymocytes was due to the passive acquisition of these accessory molecules from CD4+/CD8+ cells present within the thymus. To investigate this possibility directly, we made both in vivo and in vitro mixes of thymocytes possessing different alleles of CD8 (Ly‐2.1 and Ly‐2.2). Under these experimental conditions, we detected Ly‐2.2 on the surface of thymocytes that were genetically Ly‐2.1+ and incapable of synthesizing Ly‐2.2. These data indicate that thymocytes can express cell surface CD8 molecules which they have not produced but have acquired from other cells in their environment. Thus, the present study indicates that low‐level surface expression of cell surface CD4/CD8 differentiation molecules does not necessarily identify distinct thymocyte subpopulations.
Antigens, Differentiation, T-Lymphocyte, Mice, Mice, Inbred AKR, T-Lymphocyte Subsets, CD8 Antigens, T-Lymphocytes, CD4 Antigens, Histocompatibility Antigens Class I, Animals
Antigens, Differentiation, T-Lymphocyte, Mice, Mice, Inbred AKR, T-Lymphocyte Subsets, CD8 Antigens, T-Lymphocytes, CD4 Antigens, Histocompatibility Antigens Class I, Animals
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
