
doi: 10.1002/dvdy.476
pmid: 35403281
AbstractBackgroundAxolotls can regenerate their limbs. In their limb regeneration process, developmental genes are re‐expressed and reorganize the developmental axes, in which the position‐specific genes are properly re‐expressed. However, how such position specificity is reorganized in the regeneration processes has not been clarified. To address this issue, we focused on the reactivation process of Lmx1b, which determines the limb dorsal identity in many animals.ResultsHere, we show that Lmx1b expression is maintained in the dorsal skin before amputation and is activated after amputation. Furthermore, we demonstrate that only cells located in the dorsal side prior to limb amputation could reactivate Lmx1b after limb amputation. We also found that Lmx1b activation was achieved by nerve presence. The nerve factors, BMP2+FGF2+FGF8 (B2FF), consistently reactivate Lmx1b when applied to the dorsal skin.ConclusionsThese results imply that the retained Lmx1b expression in the intact skin plays a role in positional memory, which instruct cells about the spatial positioning before amputation. This memory is reactivated by nerves or nerve factors that can trigger the entire limb regeneration process. Our findings highlight the role of nerves in amphibian limb regeneration, including both the initiation of limb regeneration and the reactivation of position‐specific gene expression.
Ambystoma mexicanum, Animals, Extremities, Amputation, Surgical, Skin
Ambystoma mexicanum, Animals, Extremities, Amputation, Surgical, Skin
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
