
doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21309
pmid: 17849438
AbstractTo study the role of Cdc42 in the establishment of epithelial polarity during mammalian development, we generated murine Cdc42‐null embryonic stem cells and analyzed peri‐implantation development using embryoid bodies (EBs). Mutant EBs developed endoderm and underlying basement membrane, but exhibited defects of cell polarity, cell–cell junctions, survival, and cavitation. These defects corresponded to a decreased phosphorylation and membrane localization of aPKC, a reduced phosphorylation of GSK3β, and a diminished activity of Rac1. However, neither Rac1 nor the kinase function of GSK3β seem to contribute to cell polarization and cell–cell contacts. In contrast, EBs expressing dominant‐negative (dn) PKCζ mimicked well the phenotype of Cdc42‐null EBs, suggesting a major role of aPKC in mediating cell polarization downstream of Cdc42. Finally, aggregation experiments with endodermal cell lines suggested that Cdc42 might affect formation of adherens and tight junctions by PKCζ‐dependent regulation of the protein levels of p120 catenin and E‐cadherin. Developmental Dynamics 236:2767–2778, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
rac1 GTP-Binding Protein, Cell Polarity, Catenins, Epithelial Cells, Adherens Junctions, Cadherins, Basement Membrane, Tight Junctions, Repressor Proteins, Mice, Animals, cdc42 GTP-Binding Protein, rhoA GTP-Binding Protein, Embryonic Stem Cells, Protein Kinase C
rac1 GTP-Binding Protein, Cell Polarity, Catenins, Epithelial Cells, Adherens Junctions, Cadherins, Basement Membrane, Tight Junctions, Repressor Proteins, Mice, Animals, cdc42 GTP-Binding Protein, rhoA GTP-Binding Protein, Embryonic Stem Cells, Protein Kinase C
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 65 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
