
doi: 10.1002/dmrr.483
pmid: 15386816
AbstractBackgroundEvaluation of glycated hemoglobin determination methods in patients with clinically silent hemoglobin variants.MethodsHbA1c results were determined with various methods, including a new enzymatic assay, a boronate affinity HPLC, immunoassays and ion‐exchange HPLC in patients with the clinically silent hemoglobin variants Hb Graz, Hb Sherwood Forest, Hb D and Hb O Padova.ResultsThe effect of hemoglobin variants on glycated hemoglobin determination was method‐dependent. The enzymatic and boronate affinity HPLC method did not interfere with any of the variants evaluated. In contrast, Hb Graz interfered with all immunoassay and ion‐exchange HPLC methods evaluated. The Tosoh ion‐exchange HPLC method HLC‐723 did not detect the late migrating Hb O Padova in the chromatogram, but this hemoglobin variant still interfered causing artificially low HbA1c results.ConclusionsOur study underscores the need for clinical laboratories and physicians to be aware of the limitations of their HbA1c assay methods as well as the importance of visual inspection of ion‐exchange chromatograms to detect abnormalities caused by the hemoglobin variants. Samples with clinically silent Hb variants should be analyzed by a second method with a different assay principle, preferably a boronate affinity HPLC or an enzymatic assay. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Glycated Hemoglobin, Immunoassay, Hemoglobins, Abnormal, Genetic Variation, Chromatography, Ion Exchange, Boronic Acids, Hemoglobins, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Case-Control Studies, Humans, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
Glycated Hemoglobin, Immunoassay, Hemoglobins, Abnormal, Genetic Variation, Chromatography, Ion Exchange, Boronic Acids, Hemoglobins, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Case-Control Studies, Humans, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
