
doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2746
pmid: 26455509
AbstractIt is known that the relative importance of factors involved in the development of diabetic foot problems can vary in both their presence and severity between patients and lesions. This may be one of the reasons why outcomes seem to vary centre to centre and why some treatments may seem more effective in some people than others. There is a need therefore to classify and describe lesions of the foot in patients with diabetes in a manner that is agreed across all communities but is simple to use in clinical practice. No single system is currently in widespread use, although a number have been published. Not all are well validated outside the system from which they were derived, and it has not always been made clear the clinical purposes to which such classifications should be put to use, whether that be for research, clinical description in routine clinical care or audit. Here the currently published classification systems, their validation in clinical practice, whether they were designed for research, audit or clinical care, and the strengths and weaknesses of each are explored. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Wound Healing, Foot, Soft Tissue Infections, International Agencies, Congresses as Topic, Severity of Illness Index, Cell Hypoxia, Diabetic Foot, Diabetic Neuropathies, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Skin Diseases, Infectious, Diabetic Angiopathies
Wound Healing, Foot, Soft Tissue Infections, International Agencies, Congresses as Topic, Severity of Illness Index, Cell Hypoxia, Diabetic Foot, Diabetic Neuropathies, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Skin Diseases, Infectious, Diabetic Angiopathies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 73 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
