
This article is meant to be a “reality check” for the direct marketing industry. It suggests that, in order to succeed in the 1990s, direct marketing firms must avoid “marketing inertia” by becoming more adaptable to both internal and external conditions. Empirically, this study re-analyzes data from a fall 1990 survey of direct marketing industry executives conducted by the Direct Marketing Association, Inc., in cooperation with David Shepard Associates, Inc. It investigates these direct marketers’ perceptions of the internal strengths and weaknesses and external opportunities and threats that might influence their firms’ strategic decisions and future success in a changing market environment.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
