Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Developmental Psycho...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Developmental Psychobiology
Article . 1989 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Nutritive and nonnutritive sucking and the temporal organization of the sucking behavior of domestic piglets

Authors: J, Rushen; D, Fraser;

Nutritive and nonnutritive sucking and the temporal organization of the sucking behavior of domestic piglets

Abstract

AbstractDetailed video recordings of the sucking behavior of one piglet from each of four litters were analyzed to determine how the components of piglet suckling behavior are organized in relation to the time of milk ejection and the temporal pattern of grunting by the sow. Early in the suckling episode, most piglets massaged the udder with their snouts, and then changed gradually to suckling the teats with slow mouth movements (1–2/sec). The piglets then had a distinct phase of sucking with rapid mouth movements (4–5/sec), which began suddenly and lasted about 5 to 15 sec. The weight gains of piglets removed at different times showed that piglets consumed milk during the fast sucking but not during the preceding slow sucking, regardless of how much slow sucking had occurred. Three of the four sows showed a characteristic increase in rate of grunting about 20 to 25 sec before fast sucking began. The piglets' change from massaging to slow sucking often coincided with the increase in grunt rate, but the timing of the transition varied greatly. This suggests that the change in grunnting is one but not the only cue used by the piglets to time their suckling behavior. During the slow, nonnnutritive sucking, mouth movements were highly variable in duration, with occasional short bursts of rapid mouth movements. This contrasted with the more uniform duration of fast sucking movements. Evidently, in piglets, nutritive and nonnutritive sucking differ in both rate and temporal patterning.

Keywords

Swine, Animals, Newborn, Sucking Behavior, Animals, Lactation, Female, Milk Ejection, Vocalization, Animal, Arousal, Maternal Behavior

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    32
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
32
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!