Evidence‐based adequacy criteria for instrumented urine cytology using cytospin preparations

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 16 Jan 2018 English Publisher:WileyJournal:Diagnostic Cytopathology, volume 46, pages 520-521 (issn: 8755-1039, eissn: 1097-0339,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Andrew A. Renshaw; Edwin W. Gould;

doi: 10.1002/dc.23890

pmid: 29341477

Evidence‐based adequacy criteria for instrumented urine cytology using cytospin preparations

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Cytospin preparations of instrumented urine cytology specimens with less than 10 urothelial cells or more than 50 urothelial cells/10 hpfs are both associated with significantly increased false negative rates compared to cases with 10‐49 urothelial cells/10 hpfs.

Related Organizations

Baptist Health South Florida
United States
Baptist Hospital of Miami
United States

Keywords

Evidence-Based Medicine, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Humans, Urine, Urothelium, False Negative Reactions

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	6
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average