
doi: 10.1002/dc.20654
pmid: 17854084
AbstractThis study investigates the rule that repeating cytological preparations on liquid‐based cytology improves sample adequacy, diagnosis, microbiological, and hormonal evaluations. We reviewed 156 cases of pap‐stained preparations of exfoliated cervical cells in two slides processed by DNA‐Cytoliq System®. After sample repeat/dilution, limiting factors affecting sample adequacy were removed in nine cases and three unsatisfactory cases were reclassified as satisfactory. Diagnosis was altered in 24 cases. Of these, the original diagnosis in 15 was atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; after the second slide examination, diagnosis in 5 of the 15 cases changed to low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, 3 to high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, and 7 to absence of lesion. Microbiological evaluation was altered, with Candida sp. detected in two repeated slides. Repeat slide preparation or dilution of residual samples enhances cytological diagnosis and decreases effects of limiting factors in manually processed DIGENE DCS LBC. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2007;35:663–669. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Adult, Vaginal Smears, Adolescent, Cytological Techniques, Candidiasis, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cervix Uteri, Middle Aged, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Female, Diagnostic Errors, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Vaginal Smears, Adolescent, Cytological Techniques, Candidiasis, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cervix Uteri, Middle Aged, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Female, Diagnostic Errors, Aged, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
