
doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21239
pmid: 25906832
Flow cytometry has become an indispensible tool for the diagnosis and classification of hematopoietic neoplasms. The ability to rapidly distinguish cellular subpopulations via multiparametric assessment of quantitative differences in antigen expression on single cells and enumerate the relative sizes of the resulting subpopulations is a key feature of the technology. More recently, these capabilities have been expanded to include the identification and enumeration of rare subpopulations within complex cellular mixtures, for example, blood or bone marrow, leading to the application for post‐therapeutic monitoring or minimal residual disease detection. This review will briefly present the principles to be considered in the construction and use of flow cytometric assays for minimal residual disease detection including the use of informative antibody combinations, the impact of immunophenotypic instability, enumeration, assay sensitivity, and reproducibility. © 2015 International Clinical Cytometry Society
Neoplasm, Residual, Remission Induction, Gene Expression, Reproducibility of Results, Antineoplastic Agents, Bone Marrow Cells, Flow Cytometry, Prognosis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Survival Analysis, Antibodies, Immunophenotyping, Antigens, CD, Hematologic Neoplasms, Humans, Lymphocytes
Neoplasm, Residual, Remission Induction, Gene Expression, Reproducibility of Results, Antineoplastic Agents, Bone Marrow Cells, Flow Cytometry, Prognosis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Survival Analysis, Antibodies, Immunophenotyping, Antigens, CD, Hematologic Neoplasms, Humans, Lymphocytes
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 144 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
