
doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.10006
pmid: 12500302
AbstractBackgroundThe comet or single‐cell gel electrophoresis assay is a sensitive method for the detection of DNA damage. The main drawback of comet sampling is the low cell density necessary to prevent nucleus overlap after electrophoresis, which limits large‐scale high throughput screening. Another problem may be inconsistent comet focusing. We investigated whether an approach based on three‐dimensional (3D) confocal microscopy might be beneficial for these concerns.MethodsA vertical comet assay enabling three‐dimensional confocal comet imaging of nuclei seeded at very high density was developed together with dedicated software algorithms to retrieve quantitative data at the single cell level.ResultsThree‐dimensional confocal comet imaging greatly relieved the user interactions of our nonautomated two‐dimensional comet sampling procedure. Batches of comets were blindly sampled, and confocal sectioning improved the clarity of the images and the accuracy of comet sampling. A 1‐Gy dose response was readily established. The sampling speed was competitive with that of commercial packages.ConclusionsVertical comet imaging is a new concept for fast and user‐friendly comet sampling that allows miniaturization of the assay. It may become an essential step toward high throughput screening and exploit the benefits of confocal imaging. Cytometry Part A 51A:26–34, 2003. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Cell Nucleus, Microscopy, Confocal, Reproducibility of Results, DNA, Cell Line, Mice, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Animals, Comet Assay, Algorithms, Software, DNA Damage
Cell Nucleus, Microscopy, Confocal, Reproducibility of Results, DNA, Cell Line, Mice, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Animals, Comet Assay, Algorithms, Software, DNA Damage
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
