Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Cytometryarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Cytometry
Article . 1995 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
Cytometry
Article . 1996
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Standardization of absolute CD4+ lymphocyte counts across laboratories: An evaluation of the ortho CytoronAbsolute flow cytometry system on normal donors

Authors: Eileen Page; Thomas J. Mercolino; Alan L. Landay; Marilyn D. Knight; Janis V. Giorgi; Mark C. Connelly; Cathie Spino; +3 Authors

Standardization of absolute CD4+ lymphocyte counts across laboratories: An evaluation of the ortho CytoronAbsolute flow cytometry system on normal donors

Abstract

AbstractThe Ortho CytoronAbsolute is a flow cytometer designed to provide direct absolute counts of lymphocytes and their subsets from a single instrument. This study was designed to determine the performance of four geographically separated CytoronAbsolute instruments using 24‐h‐old, shipped, whole blood samples and to compare the results obtained on the CytoronAbsolute to those obtained using combinations of hematology instruments and other flow cytometers. The absolute count feature of the CytoronAbsolutes located at the four sites were cross calibrated and gave across‐site coefficients of variation (CVs) of <4.0% for absolute count and 8.2% for absolute lymphocyte count. The calibration was stable for at least 2 months. Absolute lymphocyte counts and lymphocyte percentage immunophenotypes were determined on blood from 50 healthy human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)‐seronegative donors. There were no significant site‐to‐site differences (each P > .05) in CD3+/CD4+ absolute lymphocyte counts determined on the CytoronAbsolute. In contrast, there was a significant site‐to‐site difference (P < .001) between sites 2 and 3 and sites 3 and 4 in the absolute CD3+/CD4+ lymphocyte counts determined via the conventional method of combining a flow cytometry‐derived percentage with a hematology instrument‐derived lymphocyte count. There was no significant difference (P = .388) in CD3+/CD4+ lymphocyte percent determinations between the CytoronAbsolute and the FACScan or Profile II flow cytometers used in this study. These results demonstrate that different operators can cross calibrate CytoronAbsolutes for absolute CD3+/CD4+ lymphocyte subset determinations, even over large geographic distances. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Keywords

Evaluation Studies as Topic, Calibration, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Flow Cytometry, Tissue Donors, CD4 Lymphocyte Count

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    58
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
58
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!