Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Crop Sciencearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Crop Science
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Influence of Bt and environmental factors on Fusarium ear rot in maize

Authors: Eric N. Butoto; Alexis M. Alsdorf; Dominic D. Reisig; James B. Holland;

Influence of Bt and environmental factors on Fusarium ear rot in maize

Abstract

AbstractFusarium verticillioides is responsible for Fusarium ear rot (FER) and fumonisin (FUM) in maize (Zea mays L.). Multiple factors, including drought stress, humidity, and insects, influence the severity of FER and FUM. This study aimed to assess the occurrence and severity of FER, FUM, and corn earworm (Helicoverpa zea Boddie) feeding in Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) and non‐Bt maize grown on commercial farms in North Carolina. We attempt to identify important environmental factors specific to maize growth stages that contribute to FER and FUM. Two Bt and three non‐Bt hybrids were sampled in 50 environments in North Carolina for FER and FUM under natural infection. Bt hybrids had 7.2% ear rot compared to 11.7% for non‐Bt hybrids. For corn earworm feeding, Bt hybrids had 1.5 cm2 per ear of feeding damage compared to 4.2 cm2 per ear for non‐Bt hybrids. Although differences in FUM were not significant, Bt hybrids had a numerically lower FUM than non‐Bt hybrids. In some counties and years, the FUM levels exceeded those recommended for products intended for human and animal consumption, with the highest level recorded at 27.8 ppm in a non‐Bt hybrid. We identified several environmental covariates related to FER, FUM, and corn earworm feeding. The results highlight the complexity of ear rots, mycotoxin, and insects and their interaction in maize. It also highlights a need for a larger sample size in multiple environments with adequate variation in FER, FUM, and insect feeding to tease apart factors influencing ear rots and mycotoxins.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Top 10%
Average
Average
hybrid