Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Crop Sciencearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Crop Science
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Sward responses of rhizoma peanut–bahiagrass mixtures and bahiagrass monocultures in contrasting on‐farm environments

Authors: Luana M. D. Queiroz; Jose C. B. Dubeux; Lynn E. Sollenberger; Joao M. B. Vendramini; Hui‐ling Liao; Cheryl L. Mackowiak; Edzard van Santen; +7 Authors

Sward responses of rhizoma peanut–bahiagrass mixtures and bahiagrass monocultures in contrasting on‐farm environments

Abstract

AbstractIncorporating forage legumes into grass swards has the potential to enhance the sustainability of pasture systems and reduce reliance on nitrogen fertilizers. The aim of this study was to assess the on‐farm performance of bahiagrass (BG; Paspalum notatum Flüggé)–rhizoma peanut (RP; Arachis glabrata Benth.) mixtures compared to BG monocultures in three diverse environments across Florida. Three forage treatments were employed at all locations: BG in monoculture (Bh), BG + Ecoturf RP (Eco), and BG + Florigraze RP (Flo). Significantly greater herbage accumulation rates were observed for BG + Ecoturf RP (37 kg DM ha−1 day−1, where DM is the dry matter) and BG with Florigraze RP (35 kg DM ha−1 day−1) in comparison with BG in monoculture (30 kg DM ha−1 day−1). Crude protein and in vitro digestible organic matter concentrations were greater for RP binary mixtures compared with monoculture BG across all locations. In North and South Florida, BG + Ecoturf RP exhibited greater RP belowground biomass than BG + Florigraze RP. Additionally, biological N2 fixation increased linearly as the proportion of RP increased. Integration of RP germplasm Ecoturf and the Florigraze cultivar into BG pastures in North, Central, and South Florida led to increased rates of herbage accumulation and improved herbage nutritive value compared to BG monoculture. Overall, North and South Florida exhibited more favorable responses to the inclusion of RP compared to Central Florida.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
hybrid
Related to Research communities