
AbstractObjectivesA lack of consensus on how to classify post‐operative complications in dentistry limits the ability for comparison of outcomes among treatments and their primary providers. Therefore, the Fonthill Dental Surgery Complication Classification Scale has been proposed as a uniform reporting tool to allow for the standardized quality assessment of dental treatment. This instrument classifies negative outcomes arising after dental treatment and is based on the clinician and the clinician time required to resolve the complication in seven classes of increasing severity.Materials and MethodsThe scale was evaluated in a cohort of 2,382 consecutive patients, of which 9% experienced a complication, the majority of which were Class I or Class II—resolved without intervention by the dental surgeon.ResultsFour scenarios where interpretation of the scale was required are presented with an explanation of their complication class.ConclusionsThis classification system will ultimately prove reliable in measuring clinician success rate and aiding in the decision‐making process for patients, clinicians, and financial providers.
Consensus, implant, dental, Short Communication, Decision Making, Oral Surgical Procedures, complication, RK1-715, periodontal, Postoperative Complications, classification, Dentistry, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Humans
Consensus, implant, dental, Short Communication, Decision Making, Oral Surgical Procedures, complication, RK1-715, periodontal, Postoperative Complications, classification, Dentistry, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Humans
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
