
doi: 10.1002/cpz1.982
pmid: 38270535
AbstractAlpha‐1,6 core fucosylation (CF) is a unique glycoform of N‐glycans, and studies showed that CF modifications are involved in the occurrence and progression of various diseases and may provide potential disease biomarkers. Current strategies for the CF glycoproteome are often based on multistep enrichment of glycoproteins or glycopeptides and sequential cleavage with different glycosidases to truncate the N‐glycans. Although the detection ability of low‐abundance glycoproteins is improved, sample loss, high cost, and the time‐consuming multistep operation also affect the reproducibility of results and the practicality of the method. Here we developed a single‐step truncation (SST) strategy and evaluated its potential for the CF glycoproteome of human serum. The SST strategy has the advantages of fewer operational steps, lower cost, higher number of identifications, and better quantitative stability compared with previous approaches and provides an efficient solution for large‐scale quantitative analysis of the CF glycoproteome. © 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.Basic Protocol 1: Single‐step truncation strategy for core fucosylation glycoproteome analysis in human serumBasic Protocol 2: Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry quantification of site‐specific core fucosylation glycopeptidesAlternate Protocol: Pretreatment of cellular samples of core fucosylation glycoproteome with single‐step truncation strategy
Proteome, Polysaccharides, Glycopeptides, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Glycoproteins, Chromatography, Liquid
Proteome, Polysaccharides, Glycopeptides, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Glycoproteins, Chromatography, Liquid
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
