Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Clinical Pharmacolog...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Esketamine Nasal Spray in Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Authors: Zhibin Wang; Lili Jiang; Wenzhuang Ma; Xingyue Li; Qiushi Gao; Siyu Lian; Weiwei Yu;

Esketamine Nasal Spray in Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Abstract

Despite being approved by the US FDA and the EU European Medicines Agency, the performance of esketamine nasal spray as an adjunctive therapy with an antidepressant in major depressive disorder is still controversial. Comprehensive retrieval in Embase, Pubmed, and Web of Science was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials comparing esketamine nasal spray versus control in major depressive disorder or treatment‐resistant depression. The primary efficacy outcome was a reduction of the Montgomery‐Asberg Depression Rating Scale, from baseline to Day 2 or Day 28 for patients with or without suicidal ideation, respectively. The long‐term efficacy outcome was the relapse rate of patients who achieved stable remission. The certainty of evidence was assessed according to the Cochrane recommendation. Esketamine nasal spray was superior to placebo in reduction of Montgomery‐Asberg Depression Rating Scale from baseline to Day 28 in patients without suicidal ideation (standardized mean difference: −0.24, 95% confidence interval: −0.38, −0.09, P = 0.001, I2 = 24%), and on Day 2 in patients with suicidal ideation (standardized mean difference: −0.30, 95% confidence interval: −0.47, −0.12, P = 0.0008, I2 = 0%). The long‐term relapse rate was significantly lower in the esketamine nasal spray group than in the placebo/quetiapine group (risk ratio: RR: 0.60, 95% confidence interval: 0.45–0.80, I2 = 0%). The rate of suicidal ideation was similar between the two groups. The certainty of evidence was graded as “moderate” or “high” in the abovementioned results. Esketamine nasal spray in conjunction with an antidepressant effectively controls short‐term and long‐term depressive symptoms in major depressive disorder and treatment‐resistant depression, with a manageable trade‐off between efficacy and safety.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant, Treatment Outcome, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Ketamine, Nasal Sprays, Antidepressive Agents, Administration, Intranasal, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Suicidal Ideation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!